Comanche vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,493,495 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 17.9 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $111,602, a difference of 30.1%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $114,553, a difference of 29.4%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $49,173, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $52,540, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $65,326, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 45.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.6%).