Comanche vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,063,140 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $64,920, a difference of 18.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $98,778, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $84,729, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.63%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,403, a difference of 3.5%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,488, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.4%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%).