Sudanese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,949,715 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,695 compared to $36,631, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $83,943, a difference of 11.6%), and median family income ($96,783 compared to $86,852, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $47,015, a difference of 0.070%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $80,005, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty (15.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 71.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 69.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.38%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 16.2%).