Comanche vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,762,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $76,362, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $66,974, a difference of 10.1%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $81,385, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,673, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $54,096, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $40,233, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 57.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.56%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 81.0%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.9%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.8%).