Comanche vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,911,603 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.079% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 78.9 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $104,560, a difference of 21.9%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $45,858, a difference of 20.4%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,597, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $52,336, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $39,724, a difference of 11.4%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.3%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 11.0%).