Turkish vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,338,240 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 55.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $36,631, a difference of 43.0%), median household income ($99,389 compared to $70,539, a difference of 40.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $83,943, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $47,015, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $53,847, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 60.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 58.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 89.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.4%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 55.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 78.9%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.9%).