Taiwanese vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Chippewa

Good
Fair
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,936,762 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.232% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 232.4 Chippewa.
Taiwanese Integration in Chippewa Communities

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,900 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $80,005, a difference of 26.9%), and per capita income ($46,455 compared to $36,631, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.68%), householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $35,003, a difference of 15.9%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Excellent
25.0%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 61.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 119.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 71.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.7%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.0%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.3%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 47.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
42.6%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.5%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Taiwanese vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 52.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.57%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Taiwanese vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseChippewa
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%