Comanche vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,982,121 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.909. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.983% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 983.5 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $52,649, a difference of 38.2%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $120,301, a difference of 35.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $115,957, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $52,783, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $67,326, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 76.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 64.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 45.0%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.6%).