Romanian vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Chippewa
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,366,854 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Chippewa.
Romanian vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $36,631, a difference of 32.3%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $70,539, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $46,368, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $47,015, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Excellent 25.0% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 46.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 85.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 48.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Romanian vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 47.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Chippewa |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |