Alsatian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,630,612 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 24.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $36,631, a difference of 29.1%), median household income ($85,053 compared to $70,539, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $83,943, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $47,015, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $35,003, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 87.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.0%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.30%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).