Comanche vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,203,061 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 43.2 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $78,986, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $36,530, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $47,994, a difference of 0.43%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,785, a difference of 0.80%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $87,820, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 14.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.3%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.5%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%).