Comanche vs Aleut Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,443,050 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.131% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 130.6 Aleuts.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $100,052, a difference of 16.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $62,708, a difference of 14.2%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $83,446, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,377, a difference of 6.0%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $51,168, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%), female poverty (16.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.60%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 53.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.2%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.64%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.5%).