Comanche vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Creek
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,850,056 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 37.0 Creek.
Comanche vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $74,847, a difference of 9.8%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $67,715, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $78,960, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $39,648, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $45,371, a difference of 4.7%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Comanche vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.5%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Comanche vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Creek |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Comanche vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 77.7% |
Comanche vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Creek |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Comanche vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Comanche vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Comanche vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |