Immigrants from North America vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,145,576 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from North America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.268% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North America corresponds to an increase of 268.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,302 compared to $36,631, a difference of 34.6%), median household income ($91,860 compared to $70,539, a difference of 30.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,198 compared to $83,943, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,307 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.4%), wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($41,319 compared to $35,003, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.7%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North America and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%).