Creek vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Creek
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Creek
Chippewa
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Creek Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,212,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Chippewa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f81/06f8173e82cc303c43f10fe30d0bf87c574c865b" alt="Creek Integration in Chippewa Communities"
Creek vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $80,005, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $83,943, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,287, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.0%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a6ea/3a6ea187f8eef7b247079eb8f07618f9271eb344" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Income"
Income Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,546 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,560 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,715 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,648 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,594 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,437 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,371 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $74,847 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $78,960 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,949 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Excellent 25.0% |
Creek vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c39d/7c39d9b3a0e0f2d4e3d741511efe2ae1a378766f" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Poverty"
Poverty Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 24.2% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Creek vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/868a0/868a01ccf06fdd9ddc71a838c92bd2079973c7b4" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Unemployment"
Unemployment Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Creek vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7309f/7309f4c82b90a9f746cd097ae564c974f7e43d9a" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Labor Participation"
Labor Participation Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.1% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.7% | Tragic 81.3% |
Creek vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/255ff/255ff652c37c3eafdb718cd2633b8fabf3d7431d" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Family Structure"
Family Structure Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.3% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 46.0% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 42.6% |
Creek vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da556/da556d1176cbd7a6dc7cb6234982b79a44caa07b" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability"
Vehicle Availability Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Creek vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63c5a/63c5a0cc447620dc8acbd73dce0fff83c11c8bee" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Education Level"
Education Level Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.2% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Creek vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.5%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23a72/23a7227e9c9526447fcb4c968aee57cd9622b8c2" alt="Creek vs Chippewa Disability"
Disability Metric | Creek | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |