Creek vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,212,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $80,005, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $83,943, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,287, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.5%), ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%).