Hispanic or Latino vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,419,213 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $47,015, a difference of 6.9%), median household income ($73,823 compared to $70,539, a difference of 4.7%), and per capita income ($35,688 compared to $36,631, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,288 compared to $40,287, a difference of 0.0%), median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $46,368, a difference of 0.11%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (29.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (44.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 85.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and college, under 1 year (57.0% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.2%).