Comanche vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,665,996 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.946. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.299% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 299.4 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $51,875, a difference of 36.2%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $118,013, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $114,220, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,523, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $43,106, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 46.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 61.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.8%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%).