Comanche vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,470,608 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 7.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $101,387, a difference of 18.2%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $103,273, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $95,070, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,224, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $38,738, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $60,581, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.3%).