Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chippewa
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,432,750 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 189.7 Chippewa.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $53,847, a difference of 13.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $47,015, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $70,539, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $80,005, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($35,477 compared to $35,003, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $46,368, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 25.5%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 81.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 29.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 87.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chippewa |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |