Comanche vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Arapaho
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,914,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 6.8 Arapaho.
Comanche vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $32,345, a difference of 17.7%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $41,758, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $71,697, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 6.7%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $82,064, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $44,003, a difference of 8.0%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 36.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 136.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 104.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 77.1% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.64, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 47.1% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.6%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.2% |
Comanche vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |