Swiss vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,135,001 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 31.3 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $83,943, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($85,681 compared to $70,539, a difference of 21.5%), and per capita income ($44,076 compared to $36,631, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $35,003, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $53,847, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.4%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 68.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.4%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%).