Comanche vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,269,842 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 19.7 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $29,031, a difference of 31.2%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $70,989, a difference of 24.7%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $59,159, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,046, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $42,380, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 98.3%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 70.2%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.5%), single female poverty (25.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 79.1%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 69.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 40.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.1%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 35.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.070%), female disability (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.32%).