Italian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,701,647 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $83,943, a difference of 31.3%), median household income ($92,475 compared to $70,539, a difference of 31.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $80,005, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $35,003, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 51.8%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.7%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.2%).