Native/Alaskan vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,344,515 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.316% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 316.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $36,631, a difference of 10.1%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $86,852, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $80,005, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $47,015, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $53,847, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.6%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and single male poverty (19.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.0%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.45 compared to 3.20, a difference of 7.8%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.56%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and associate's degree (34.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.53%).