Comanche vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,515,483 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 170.3 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $46,569, a difference of 22.3%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $108,251, a difference of 22.2%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $89,640, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,818, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $56,243, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.5%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 23.0%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.45%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.12%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 48.2%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.5%).