Comanche vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,896,016 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 178.3 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $33,921, a difference of 12.3%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $67,792, a difference of 8.8%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $82,386, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,063, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $46,417, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.5%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 14.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 31.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.9%).