Comanche vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,662,674 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 59.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $47,394, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $108,830, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $104,992, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,914, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $63,643, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.6%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 44.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 9.6%).