Potawatomi vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Chippewa

Fair
Fair
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,785,913 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 92.3 Chippewa.
Potawatomi Integration in Chippewa Communities

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.0%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $46,368, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($38,046 compared to $36,631, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $53,847, a difference of 0.68%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $35,003, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $83,943, a difference of 0.80%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricPotawatomiChippewa
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
25.0%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.8%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiChippewa
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiChippewa
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
81.3%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiChippewa
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
42.6%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Potawatomi vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Potawatomi vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiChippewa
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%