Comanche vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,784,208 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.906% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 2,905.6 Tsimshian.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $97,809, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,649, a difference of 15.0%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $101,543, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($41,519 compared to $43,695, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 75.8%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 119.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 77.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.91%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 93.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.7%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.0%).