Comanche vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,751,973 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.252% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 1,251.7 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $42,581, a difference of 13.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $76,903, a difference of 11.6%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $79,563, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $47,907, a difference of 0.82%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $79,358, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $33,894, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty (16.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 107.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 66.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 84.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.4%).