Comanche vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,801,369 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.255% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 1,254.5 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $50,914, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $111,454, a difference of 29.9%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $114,826, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,737, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $64,298, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 57.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 45.7%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.9%).