Comanche vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,508,310 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 34.8 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,747 compared to $85,611, a difference of 16.1%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $44,068, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $99,126, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $59,151, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $39,643, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.23%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.2%).