Comanche vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Comanche
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Comanche

Lithuanians

Poor
Excellent
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Lithuanian Integration in Comanche Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,745,921 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 33.8 Lithuanians.
Comanche Integration in Lithuanian Communities

Comanche vs Lithuanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $112,484, a difference of 31.1%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $115,395, a difference of 30.3%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $49,448, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,552, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $42,108, a difference of 18.1%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Income
Income MetricComancheLithuanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,088
Exceptional
$49,448
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,556
Exceptional
$115,395
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,747
Exceptional
$93,852
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,519
Exceptional
$50,991
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,202
Exceptional
$61,228
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,661
Exceptional
$42,108
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,518
Exceptional
$53,552
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,152
Exceptional
$105,223
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,787
Exceptional
$112,484
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,922
Exceptional
$65,209
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
28.7%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.8%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.1%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Poverty
Poverty MetricComancheLithuanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.7%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricComancheLithuanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricComancheLithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.7%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
83.6%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricComancheLithuanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Fair
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
49.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricComancheLithuanian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Exceptional
58.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Average
6.3%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Education Level
Education Level MetricComancheLithuanian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Fair
95.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.4%
Exceptional
68.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Comanche vs Lithuanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.7%).
Comanche vs Lithuanian Disability
Disability MetricComancheLithuanian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%