Immigrants from Scotland vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,990,510 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.663. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.630% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 629.8 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,893 compared to $36,631, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $83,943, a difference of 33.6%), and median household income ($94,091 compared to $70,539, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $47,015, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $35,003, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.2%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 75.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.7%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.6%).