Comanche vs Shoshone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,546,198 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 62.5 Shoshone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $34,677, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,072, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $83,588, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $82,062, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $47,930, a difference of 0.57%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $87,872, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.0%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 64.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.1%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.54%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.5%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.5%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.0%).