Asian vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,266,934 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $70,539, a difference of 44.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $83,943, a difference of 41.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $80,005, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $47,015, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $35,003, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 67.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 99.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 59.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.5%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.0%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.7%).