Comanche vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,033,595 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.820. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 130.2 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $49,893, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $112,175, a difference of 30.8%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $114,392, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $52,638, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $41,771, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 50.5%), receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and single mother poverty (33.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.12, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.85%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.9%).