Pakistani vs Chippewa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Chippewa

Good
Fair
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chippewa Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,879,046 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 320.2 Chippewa.
Pakistani Integration in Chippewa Communities

Pakistani vs Chippewa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,638 compared to $70,539, a difference of 27.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $83,943, a difference of 25.5%), and per capita income ($45,587 compared to $36,631, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($40,596 compared to $35,003, a difference of 16.0%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Income
Income MetricPakistaniChippewa
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Tragic
$36,631
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Tragic
$86,852
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Tragic
$70,539
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Tragic
$40,287
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Tragic
$46,368
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Tragic
$35,003
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Tragic
$47,015
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Tragic
$80,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Tragic
$83,943
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Tragic
$53,847
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Excellent
25.0%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 46.4%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.4%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniChippewa
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
23.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
21.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 81.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniChippewa
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
7.0%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniChippewa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
63.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
43.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
81.3%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 39.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.55%), family households (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniChippewa
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
42.6%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniChippewa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.6%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniChippewa
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
55.7%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Pakistani vs Chippewa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.4%).
Pakistani vs Chippewa Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniChippewa
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Tragic
27.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%