Comanche vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,300,364 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 21.9 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $49,316, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $109,335, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $104,662, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $62,693, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $55,572, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 46.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.1%).