Comanche vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,866,180 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.108% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 108.1 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $47,248, a difference of 24.0%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $107,502, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $99,449, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $49,113, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,093, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.8%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 46.5%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (63.5% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%).