Comanche vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,553,131 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 12.1 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.1%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,292, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,568, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $36,034, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $55,677, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $75,240, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.4%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.44%), single male poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.0%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.33%).