Comanche vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,370,436 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 114.6 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $33,009, a difference of 15.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,321, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $76,226, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $86,992, a difference of 1.4%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $72,225, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $56,234, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 61.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 175.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 75.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 65.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (45.0% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 90.5%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 72.4%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 24.4%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%).