Comanche vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,234,568 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $52,074, a difference of 36.7%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $118,440, a difference of 33.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $113,533, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,739, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $43,308, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.99%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 66.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 13.2%).