Comanche vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,338,254 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.238% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 238.1 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $46,700, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $104,408, a difference of 21.7%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,942, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $61,465, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,483, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.020%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.8%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.2%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.6%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 11.3%).