Comanche vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,853,338 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Thais within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 77.2 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $129,560, a difference of 51.0%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $110,648, a difference of 50.0%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $72,135, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $59,187, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $72,099, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 72.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 72.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.4%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.93%), family households (63.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 79.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 72.0%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 13.9%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.2%).