Comanche vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,999,233 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $49,862, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $110,103, a difference of 28.3%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $93,960, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $54,154, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $41,952, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.76%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 67.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 57.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.2%).