Comanche vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,780,706 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $43,997, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $96,086, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $82,560, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $56,975, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $38,945, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.3%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.010%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 11.3%).