Colville vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,903,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 17.3%), median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $35,003, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,774 compared to $47,015, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,094 compared to $70,539, a difference of 0.63%), median family income ($85,792 compared to $86,852, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $83,943, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and family poverty (13.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), male poverty (15.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and poverty (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 65.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.46%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (63.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.2%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.2%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.7%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and female disability (15.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 7.7%).