New Zealander vs Chippewa Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Chippewa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Chippewa
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chippewa Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,118,663 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 223.0 Chippewa.
New Zealander vs Chippewa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $36,631, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $70,539, a difference of 34.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $86,852, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,015, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,003, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $36,631 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $86,852 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $70,539 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $40,287 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $46,368 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $35,003 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $47,015 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $80,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $83,943 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $53,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 23.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 43.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 81.3% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 42.6% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.6% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
New Zealander vs Chippewa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.5%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Chippewa |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 27.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |