Comanche vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,539,892 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.918% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 1,918.4 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $94,517, a difference of 10.2%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $81,064, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,615, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.030%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $39,194, a difference of 2.9%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $37,298, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.3%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.36%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.5%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.5%).